t e l : 0 3 1 1 - 7 0 9 1 8 9 1 / 1 8 f a x : 0 3 1 1 - 8 7 0 9 1 2 8 2 e - m a i l : c j i a n @ c n - b o w e i . c o m h t t p : / / w w w . c n - b o w e i . c o m 8 8 7 , 8 3 9 3 3 2 5 2 OXK581 series mp581 100hz 1khz 12v 5 (option 15v) 10 120mhz 0.05 0.5ppm(see the table) 0.01ppm max /vdc 5 0.1 0.5ppm/ max) st 1 year ( +10dbm/50 -25dbc -70dbc -130 dbc/hz -155 dbc/hz 4w/1.8w max)@25 50mm*50mm*25mm 10khz 100khz -165 dbc/hz -170 dbc/hz -55 85 -145dbc/hz -160dbc/hz -165dbc/hz 10hz -100 dbc/hz 0 50 -10 60 -20 70 -30 70 -40 70 -40 85 -55 85 0 . 1 h p h q h r h s h t 0 . 0 5 j p j q j r 0 . 2 g p g q g r g s g t g u j s j t 0 . 5 f p f q f r f s f t f u f w 4 3 2 1 3 vc in 2 pin function frequency temperature stability outside frequency adjustment absolute maximum ratings features electrical specification bowei integra ted circuits co.,l td. 1:power supply 2:ground 3: rf output reference voltage output or nc 4: (ppm) with control voltage --- 16v supply voltage storage temperature --- 105 low phase noise,anti-vibration ocxo phase noise vs. of fset frequency @50mhz/random rms acceleration g =7.56 g rms rms acceleration g =6.06 g rms phase noise vs. of fset frequency @50mhz/random vibration method a vibration method b note: the following phase noise are the worse one among three axis at 1khz of fset frequency 100mhz parameter power supply frequency range f requency stability vs temperature vs supply c hanges vs ageing s i n e w a v e level harmonics non-harmonic suppression o u t p u t characteristic phase noise operation temperature range input power storage temperature range dimension dif ferent range( see the table) static v ibration(methodb) the worse axis see detail method see detail method * please contact the factory low phase noise high frequency stability good performance under vibration sc cut crystal with t o-5 package external emi filter 35
t e l : 0 3 1 1 - 7 0 9 1 8 9 1 / 1 8 f a x : 0 3 1 1 - 8 7 0 9 1 2 8 2 e - m a i l : c j i a n @ c n - b o w e i . c o m h t t p : / / w w w . c n - b o w e i . c o m 8 8 7 , 8 3 9 3 3 2 5 2 OXK581 series low phase noise,anti-vibration ocxo phase noise vs. of fset frequency @80mhz/random rms acceleration g =1 1.95 g rms rms acceleration g =9.26 g rms phase noise vs. of fset frequency @80mhz/random vibration method c vibration method d note: the following phase noise are the worse one among three axis at 1khz of fset frequency phase noise vs. of fset frequency @80mhz/random rms acceleration g =7.56 g rms rms acceleration g =6.06 g rms phase noise vs. of fset frequency @80mhz/random vibration method a vibration method b phase noise vs. of fset frequency @50mhz/random rms acceleration g =1 1.95 g rms rms acceleration g =9.26 g rms phase noise vs. of fset frequency @50mhz/random vibration method c vibration method d 36
t e l : 0 3 1 1 - 7 0 9 1 8 9 1 / 1 8 f a x : 0 3 1 1 - 8 7 0 9 1 2 8 2 e - m a i l : c j i a n @ c n - b o w e i . c o m h t t p : / / w w w . c n - b o w e i . c o m 8 8 7 , 8 3 9 3 3 2 5 2 2 OXK581 series low phase noise,anti-vibration ocxo note: the following phase noise are the worse one among three axis at 1khz of fset frequency phase noise vs. of fset frequency @100mhz/random rms acceleration g =7.56 g rms rms acceleration g =6.06 g rms phase noise vs. of fset frequency @100mhz/random vibration method a vibration method b phase noise vs. of fset frequency @100mhz/random rms acceleration g =1 1.95 g rms rms acceleration g =9.26 g rms phase noise vs. of fset frequency @100mhz/random vibration method c vibration method d phase noise vs. of fset frequency @120mhz/random rms acceleration g =7.56 g rms rms acceleration g =6.06 g rms phase noise vs. of fset frequency @120mhz/random vibration method a vibration method b 37
t e l : 0 3 1 1 - 7 0 9 1 8 9 1 / 1 8 f a x : 0 3 1 1 - 8 7 0 9 1 2 8 2 e - m a i l : c j i a n @ c n - b o w e i . c o m h t t p : / / w w w . c n - b o w e i . c o m 8 8 7 , 8 3 9 3 3 2 5 2 OXK581 series low phase noise,anti-vibration ocxo note: the following phase noise are the worse one among three axis at 1khz of fset frequency phase noise vs. of fset frequency @120mhz/random rms acceleration g =1 1.95 g rms rms acceleration g =9.26 g rms phase noise vs. of fset frequency @120mhz/random vibration method c vibration method d note 1.no less than 1uf electrolytic capacitor and 0.01 0.1uf ceramic capacitor are recommended to be used on power supply . 2.v ibration absorptive material can be used o utside o cxo t o im prove p hase no ise pe rformance un der vib ration 3.see package section for detial information of outline drawings. application notes random v ibration method method g j b 3 6 0 a m e t h o d 2 1 4 c o n d i t i o n 1 - b c g j b 3 6 0 a m e t h o d 2 1 4 c o n d i t i o n 1 - d g j b 3 6 0 a m e t h o d 2 1 4 c o n d i t i o n 1 - c d b a g j b 1 0 3 2 r a n d o m v i b r a t i o n t e s t m e t h o d 1.in phase noise performance curve, the upper curve is the performance under vibration the lower one is under static. 2.all phase noise curves showed above are the worse one of three axis at 1khz of fset frequency 3.phase noise performance depend on vibration method, please give your method when order . 38
|
